Neutrons are among the basic building blocks of matter. As long as they are part of a stable atomic nucleus, they can stay there for arbitrary periods of time. However, the situation is different for free neutrons: They decay—after about 15 minutes, on average.
Strangely enough, however, different contradictory results have been obtained for this average lifetime of free neutrons—depending on whether neutrons are measured in a neutron beam or in some kind of “bottle.”
A research team at TU Wien has now proposed a possible explanation: There could be previously undiscovered excited states of the neutron. That would mean that some neutrons could be in a state in which they have slightly more energy and a slightly different lifetime. This could explain the measured discrepancies.
The proposal is published in the journal Physical Review D. And the team already has ideas on how to detect this neutron state.
Two measurement methods, two results
By pure chance, without any reason at all, neutrons can spontaneously decay according to the laws of quantum theory—turning into a proton, an electron and an antineutrino. This is particularly likely if it is a free neutron. If the neutron combines with other particles to form an atomic nucleus, it can be stable.
The average lifetime of free neutrons is surprisingly difficult to measure. “For almost 30 years, physicists have been puzzled by contradictory results on this topic,” says Benjamin Koch from the Institute of Theoretical Physics at TU Wien.
He analyzed this puzzle together with his colleague Felix Hummel. The two are also working closely with the neutron research team led by Hartmut Abele from the Atomic Institute at TU Wien.
“For such measurements, a nuclear reactor is often used as the neutron source,” explains Koch. “Free neutrons are produced during radioactive decay in the reactor. These free neutrons can then be channeled into a neutron beam where they can be precisely measured.”
One can measure how many neutrons are present at the beginning of the neutron beam and how many protons are produced by the decay process. If these values are determined very precisely, the average lifetime of the neutrons in the beam can be calculated.
However, it is also possible to take a different approach and try to store neutrons in a kind of “bottle,” for example, with the help of magnetic fields. “This shows that neutrons from the neutron beam live around eight seconds longer than neutrons in a bottle,” says Koch.
“With an average lifespan of just under 900 seconds, this is a significant difference—far too big to be explained by mere measurement inaccuracy.”
An unknown new state?
According to Koch and Hummel, this discrepancy can be explained if one assumes that neutrons can have excited states—previously undiscovered states with a slightly higher energy. Such states are well known for atoms and are the basis for lasers, for example.
“With neutrons, it is much more difficult to calculate such states precisely,” says Koch. “However, we can estimate what properties they should have in order to explain the different results of the neutron lifetime measurements.”
The researchers’ hypothesis is that when the free neutrons emerge from radioactive decay, they are initially in a mixture of different states: Some of them are ordinary neutrons in the so-called ground state, but some of them are in an excited state, with a little more energy. Over time, however, these excited neutrons gradually change to the ground state.
“You can think of it like a bubble bath,” says Hummel. “If I add energy and bubble it up, a lot of foam is created—you could say I’ve put the bubble bath into an excited state. But if I wait, the bubbles burst and the bath returns to its original state all by itself.”
If the theory about excited neutron states is correct, that would mean that in a neutron beam, several different neutron states are present in significant numbers. The neutrons in the bottle, on the other hand, would be almost exclusively ground-state neutrons. After all, it takes time for neutrons to cool and be captured in a bottle—by which point, the vast majority will have already returned to their ground state.
“According to our model, the decay probability of a neutron strongly depends on its state,” says Hummel. Logically, this also results in different average lifetimes for neutrons in the neutron beam and neutrons in the neutron bottle.
Further experiments needed
“Our calculation model shows the parameter range in which we need to search,” says Koch. “The lifetime of the excited state must be shorter than 300 seconds, otherwise you can’t explain the difference. But it also has to be longer than 5 milliseconds, otherwise the neutrons would already be back in the ground state before they reach the beam experiment.”
The hypothesis of previously undiscovered neutron states can be tested using data from past experiments. However, this data has to be re-evaluated, and further experiments will be necessary for a convincing proof. Such experiments are now being planned.
To this end, the researchers are liaising closely with teams at TU Wien’s Institute for Atomic and Subatomic physics, whose PERC and PERKEO experiments are well-suited for this task. Research groups from Switzerland and Los Alamos in the U.S. have also already shown interest in using their measurement methods to test the new hypothesis.
Technically and conceptually, nothing stands in the way of the necessary measurements. So we can hope to learn soon whether the new thesis really has solved a decades-old problem in physics.
More information:
Benjamin Koch et al, Exciting hint toward the solution of the neutron lifetime puzzle, Physical Review D (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.073004
Provided by
Vienna University of Technology
Citation:
The neutron lifetime problem—and its possible solution (2024, October 16)
