Survey highlights 'publish or perish' culture as key factor in research irreproducibility

An international survey involving over 1,600 biomedical researchers has shed light on the perceived causes of irreproducibility in research results. The survey, which included participants from various countries and research institutions, aimed to identify the factors that contribute to the lack of reproducibility in scientific studies.

According to the survey results, published in PLOS Biology, a significant number of researchers believe that the pressure to publish and the competitive nature of the scientific field are major contributors to irreproducibility. Many respondents indicated that the “publish or perish” culture in academia often leads to rushed experiments and inadequate validation of results.

Additionally, the survey highlighted issues related to methodological flaws and the lack of transparency in reporting research methods. Researchers pointed out that incomplete or selective reporting of data and methods can hinder the ability of other scientists to replicate studies accurately.

The survey also revealed concerns about the availability and quality of research materials, such as reagents and cell lines, which can vary significantly between laboratories and affect the reproducibility of experiments.

To address these challenges, respondents suggested several measures, including increased collaboration among researchers, better training in research methodologies, and the establishment of standardized protocols for conducting and reporting experiments.

The findings of this survey underscore the need for systemic changes in the way scientific research is conducted and reported. By addressing the root causes of irreproducibility, the scientific community can enhance the reliability and credibility of research findings, ultimately advancing scientific knowledge and innovation.

More information:
PLOS Biology (2024). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002870