Can Surgical Masks Be Reused? Scientists Are Asking Some Valid Questions
Health authorities say the most widespread anti-COVID weapon – surgical masks – must be thrown away after a single use, but environmental concerns are pushing some scientists to question this recommendation.
As the coronavirus continues to spread, masks have in many places become mandatory on public transport, in shops, and at work.
But cost has become an issue, as has the fact so many disposable plastic masks wind up in waterways and the oceans.
One alternative is reusable cloth masks, but many people prefer single-use surgical masks because they are lighter and individually cheaper.
But in the context of scarcities during the first wave of the COVID-19pandemic, the WHO allowed in an April report for the resuse of decontaminated disposable masks when there is a “critical PPE (personal protective equipment) shortage, or lack of PPE.”
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed – in emergency circumstances – hydrogen peroxide vapour to decontaminate the N95 masks worn by healthcare workers.
Other methods to purify single-use masks include exposing them to high temperatures or ultraviolet radiation.
But these methods are inconvenient for people at home, said French microbiologist and member of Adios Corona, Denis Corpet.
Adios Corona – a group of scientists who provide information on COVID-19 to the public – recommends “placing the mask in a paper envelope with the date clearly marked, and leaving it for seven days”.
“Several scientific studies show that viruses are almost all dead on a mask after seven days,” said Corpet.
This method, however, is not appropriate for healthcare workers exposed to high viral loads.
Peter Tsai, the inventor of N95 electrostatically charged filter material, agrees with the seven-day method.
But he suggests leaving used masks out in the open for a week before reuse, a cycle he says can be repeated five to 10 times.
Disposable masks can also be placed in the oven, Tsai told AFP, ideally at a temperature between 70 and 75 degrees Celsius (158 and 167 degrees Fahrenheit) – not too high to avoid burning the plastic, but sufficiently hot to kill the virus.
Washing masks in a washing machine, however, is not a good idea.
“Washing without detergent may not wash away the virus,” Tsai said. “And washing with detergent will erase the (electrostatic) charges,” diminishing its efficiency.
French consumers’ rights group UFC-Que Choisir washed surgical masks at 60C, put them in the dryer, and ironed them. After 10 such cycles, the masks still filtered at least 90 percent of 3-micron particles.
“Apart from a slight felting, the washed surgical masks were at least as efficient as the best cloth masks,” UFC-Que Choisir reported last week.
Researcher Philippe Vroman from French engineering university Ensait came to the same conclusion.
After five washes, “there are practically no differences (of filtration) for particles of 3 microns,” Vroman said, on the basis of preliminary results not yet published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
“And I would rather we swap masks every four hours and wash them, rather than wearing them several days in a row as some people do. It’s a bit like underwear,” he said.
But not all scientists agree.
“Washing the mask at home could potentially cause a secondary contamination and spread the virus if washing is not set appropriately,” said Kaiming Ye, head of the biomedical engineering department at New York’s Binghamton University.
Until more research is published on the matter, official advice from health authorities is not set to change.
“Single-use surgical masks must be thrown into the bin after use,” said France’s health authority DGS, but noted that more studies were underway.