Tiny plastic particles may accumulate at higher levels in the human brain than in the kidney and liver, with greater concentrations detected in postmortem samples from 2024 than in those from 2016, suggests a paper published in Nature Medicine. Although the potential implications for human health remain unclear, these findings may highlight a consequence of rising global concentrations of environmental plastics.
The amount of environmental plastic nano- and microparticles, which range in size from as small as 1 nanometer (one billionth of a meter) up to 500 micrometers (one millionth of a meter) in diameter, has increased exponentially over the past 50 years. However, whether they are harmful or toxic to humans is unclear. Most previous studies used visual microscopic spectroscopy methods to identify particulates in human tissues, but this is often limited to particulates larger than 5 micrometers.
Researcher Matthew Campen and colleagues used novel methods to analyze the distribution of micro- and nanoparticles in samples of liver, kidney, and brain tissues from human bodies that underwent autopsy in 2016 and 2024. A total of 52 brain specimens (28 in 2016 and 24 in 2024) were analyzed.
The team detected these particles in all of the samples and found similar concentrations in the samples of liver and kidney tissues obtained in 2016. However, brain samples taken from that time, all derived from the frontal cortex region, contained substantially higher concentrations of plastic particles than the liver and kidney tissues.
The authors also found that liver and brain samples from 2024 had significantly higher concentrations of plastic micro- and nanoparticles than those from 2016. They compared these findings with those of brain tissue samples from earlier time frames (1997–2013) and noted that there were higher concentrations of plastic particles in the more recent tissue samples. Campen and colleagues also found a higher concentration of micro- and nanoplastic particles in brains from 12 individuals with a documented dementia diagnosis than in those without.
The authors note that the findings identify an association but do not establish a causal link between plastic particles and health effects. Likewise, they suggest that some variation in the brain samples could be due to geographic differences, as samples were