Can humanity drag down greenhouse gas emissions fast enough to prevent Earth’s surface from warming more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above mid-19th century levels?
That question looms larger than all others as 195 nations tussle over the UN’s first comprehensive scientific assessment of climate change since 2014, to be released Monday.
And if we can, will we?
It is hard to exaggerate how urgent and politically charged these questions have become.
“We need to make sure that we keep 1.5C within reach,” UK minister and president of the critical COP26 climate summit in November, Alok Sharma, told AFP earlier this year, leaving no doubt that success at Glasgow would be measured against that yardstick.
No one has sounded the alarm more loudly than nature itself.
An unbroken cascade of deadly, unprecedented weather disasters—bulked up by global warming—has swept across three continents since mid-June.
Asphalt-melting North American heatwaves in regions considered too temperate for air conditioning; diluvial rainfall tearing apart German towns and drowning big-city commuters trapped on the underground in central China; untamable wildfires fuelled by drought—decades of dire climate predictions are suddenly a here-and-now reality.
And that’s with average global warming of only 1.1C so far.
So has humanity dithered too long to keep the 1.5C dream alive?
There is little doubt that the planet will reach that marker—and sooner than previously thought, according to sources who have seen the penultimate draft of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) text under negotiation at a plenary this week.
A table under review projects the increase in global surface temperature for five emissions scenarios, ranging from wildly optimistic to unimaginably reckless.
In the draft, the IPCC identifies best estimates for twenty-year periods with mid-points of 2030, 2050 and 2090.
Earth’s temperature is projected to hit 1.5C or 1.6C around 2030 in all five scenarios—a full decade earlier than a similar prediction the IPCC made less than three years ago.
The news gets worse.
By mid-century, the 1.5C threshold has been breached across the board—by a tenth of a degree along the most ambitious pathway, and by nearly a full degree at the opposite extreme.
The glimmer of hope for 1.5C is that by century’s end Earth’s surface will have cooled a notch to 1.4C under the most optimistic “if-we-do-everything-right” storyline.
A brief overshoot does not mean the target has been missed, scientists caution.
But long-term trajectories do not look promising in the other four scenarios.
Temperature increases by 2090 forecast range from a hugely challenging 1.8C to a catastrophic 4.4C.
The findings are beyond dispute, and all IPCC diplomats reviewing them can do at this point is decide whether and how to present them to the world.
‘Aspirational’
By signing on to the 2015 Paris Agreement, nations pledged to collectively cap warming at “well below” 2C.
With dramatic climate impacts already at hand, however, the focus has shifted to the more ambitious but non-binding target of 1.5C, reluctantly allowed into the 2015 treaty by some countries that probably assumed it could be safely ignored.
“1.5C was aspirational,” Maynooth University professor and climatologist Peter Thorne told AFP. “But then parties turned around and asked the IPCC to do a special report on it.”
The resulting 2018 analysis starkly showed how much more devastating an extra half-degree of warming would be, for humanity and the planet.
It also showed the power of the IPCC.
“1.5C became the de facto target,” said Thorne, a lead author of the all-important IPCC Summary for Policymakers on physical science, currently under discussion. “And it has changed the framing entirely.”
The climate science community—generally on the same page when it comes to key global warming issues—remains sharply divided on 1.5C.
“There is definitely a difference of opinion among scientists about whether the 1.5C target is reachable,” Tim Lenton, director of the Global Systems Institute at the University of Exeter and an authority on climate tipping points, told AFP.
Some experts who think 1.5C is mission impossible simply avoid the subject to avoid casting a pall over efforts to ramp up climate action, he added. “They don’t discuss it.”
Degrees of difference
That porous wall of silence collapsed earlier this year when the prestigious Australian Academy of Science released a 100-page white paper on climate risk.
“Limiting climate change to 1.5C is now virtually impossible,” top scientists—including many IPCC authors—wrote, adding that even “well under 2C” would require a Herculean effort.
The reaction was fast and furious.
“Scientifically speaking, humanity can still limit global warming to 1.5C this century,” a quartet of A-list atmospheric physicists and modellers pushed back in a commentary.
“Political action will determine whether it actually does. Conflating the two questions amounts to misplaced punditry, and is dangerous.”
Even optimists agree that 1.5C would be a heavy lift. It would mean, for starters, slashing emissions in half by 2030—a mind-boggling eight percent per year—and to zero by 2050.
And yet, things are still moving in the wrong direction: the International Energy Agency reported recently that post-Covid stimulus packages will generate record levels of carbon pollution by 2023.
Some scientists, NGOs and policy experts are already preparing to navigate a world in which the milestone has slipped into the rearview mirror.
“The pathway to a stable 1.5C is clearly very, very narrow and very challenging,” Alden Meyer, senior associate at think tank E3G and a climate politics and policy veteran, told AFP.
“But that doesn’t mean you stop fighting for it. Even if you fall short, every tenth of a degree matters in terms of impacts.”
Key UN climate science talks open amid floods, fires
2021 AFP
Citation:
Keeping Earth cool: Is the 1.5C target ‘mission impossible’? (2021, August 5)
retrieved 5 August 2021
from https://phys.org/news/2021-08-earth-cool-15c-mission-impossible.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
