The riskiest instrument is the voice, at least when it comes to spreading viruses such as SARS-CoV2. Compared to breathing quietly, during singing or speaking infected people release more than 500 times particles into the air, which can contain viruses.
When people play music with wind instruments, considerably less aerosol enters the environment than during singing—but still 5 to 50 times more than during breathing, as studied by a team led by Mohsen Bagheri and Eberhard Bodenschatz, director at the MPI-DS and professor at the Faculty of Physics at the University of Göttingen.
Together with colleagues from the Institute of Hospital Hygiene and Infectiology at the UMG, the researchers analyzed how many particles of what size are released when 20 different wind instruments are played. They took the measurements under controlled conditions in a clean room and determined the upper limit for the risk of transmission with the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 from the results in each case. Their research appears in the Journal of Aerosol Science.
Risk of transmission depends on the instrument
“Surprisingly, we found that musical instruments are less risky than talking or singing,” says Mohsen Bagheri, head of a research group on aerosols at the MPI-DS. As the Göttingen team’s study shows, it is mainly the larger respiratory droplets, which are particularly important for the transmission of viruses, that remain trapped in wind instruments. The instruments thus act as a filter for larger particles.
However, wind music is not harmless for the musicians and the audience from an infection protection point of view. This is due to the fact that particles with a size of less than five micrometers mostly emerge from the instrument. They remain in the air for a longer time and spread further, so that they can reach high concentrations, especially in unventilated rooms. The number of such small particles released by wind music also depends strongly on the instrument: While the team measured a very low concentration of released particles for various flutes, the measurements yielded values for the clarinet almost as high as for singing.
For example, at a distance of one and a half meters from a clarinet and trombone, the risk of transmission is already up to 50% after four minutes. Yet, at the same distance from a flute, this risk of transmission is only reached after three hours. All values for other instruments measured were in between.
Masks for instruments and people protect better
In its study, the team also investigated how efficient the risk of transmission could be reduced by particle filters with similar properties to the fleece of FFP2 masks. They placed the prototype masks on the ends of brass instruments; woodwind instruments were almost completely encased in the filter material.
“For brass instruments, an instrument mask reliably reduces the emission of infectious particles,” said Oliver Schlenczek, principal author of the study. If, in addition, the audience also wears an FFP2 mask, the risk of transmission is no more than 0.2%, even after one hour.
Simone Scheithauer, Director of the Institute for Hospital Hygiene and Infectiology at UMG, considers these results to be very positive: “On this basis, we can recommend much more targeted protective measures in the future and maintain musical cultural activities with only minor restrictions even in critical situations,” she says.
“With adequate ventilation and the wearing of FFP2 masks, lessons, rehearsals and concerts with wind instruments can be conducted safely,” concludes aerosol researcher Eberhard Bodenschatz.
More information:
Oliver Schlenczek et al, Experimental measurement of respiratory particles dispersed by wind instruments and analysis of the associated risk of infection transmission, Journal of Aerosol Science (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106070
Provided by
Max Planck Society
Citation:
Playing wind instruments spreads more viruses than breathing, but less than speaking or singing (2022, September 23)
