Scientists skeptical of superconductor claims that went viral
A recent claim by South Korean researchers that they have created a material which works as a superconductor at room temperature—long a holy grail of physics—has been met with huge excitement on social media but skepticism from scientists.
Superconductors can carry electrical currents with zero resistance, unlike traditional materials such as copper which lose part of the charge as heat.
Since the phenomenon was discovered in 1911, thousands of superconducting materials have been found—but to work, all have to kept at extremely cold temperatures and high pressure, limiting their real-world applications.
So the race is on to find a material that superconducts at room temperature, which could lead to transformational technology that could help fight climate change, supercharge quantum computing and even boost levitating high-speed trains.
Late last month, a little-known group of South Korean physicists posted a preprint study—which has not been peer-reviewed—announcing that their material, called LK-99, can superconduct at room temperatures and ambient pressure.
They also posted a video of a small piece of the material levitating above a magnet as evidence of the feat.
The news was soon trending on Twitter, driven largely by fevered speculation among amateurs, while scientists around the world rushed to create the material and test whether it was the real deal.
Large laboratories in China and India were the first to report their findings, both determining the material could not superconduct at room temperature.
But that does not yet rule out successful replications in the future. Several preprints looking at the theoretical side have suggested that LK-99 could at least be capable of the long-sought feat.
‘Trial by Twitter’
In the midst of the social media hype—a rarity in the often dry world of materials science—experts in the field have called for patience.
Susannah Speller, a researcher at Oxford University who has worked on superconducting materials for more than 20 years, told AFP that “trial by Twitter is not going to replace the standard scientific process for checking and verifying work”.
If the scientific community has come across as a bit negative, it is because “we’ve been trained to be skeptical—and we’ve seen this all before,” Speller said.
Julien Bobroff, a physicist at France’s Paris-Saclay University, said that “we have been hearing announcements about superconductors coming in from the cold for the last 30 to 40 years, and most have turned out to be wrong.”
Indeed, late last year the prestigious Nature journal retracted a 2020 study claiming that a material conducted electricity without resistance at 15 degrees Celsius (59 Fahrenheit).
So why has the reaction been so different this time around?
Both Speller and Bobroff pointed to the video posted by the South Korean researchers, which offered a visual element that created a wow-factor on social media timelines.
However, Speller said that “there are lots of things that can levitate that are not superconductors—it’s not a test for superconductivity.”
Superconductors kept at low temperatures such as -250C already have a range of uses, including in MRI medical scanners, the Large Hadron Collider, and some high-speed levitating trains in Japan.
If the world does stumble onto a true room-temperature superconductor, perhaps the biggest impact would be on the electrical grid.
Currently, 10-15 percent of electricity is lost as the energy travels from power stations to homes.
The amount of energy saved by a room-temperature superconductor could therefore be the equivalent of “removing one or two nuclear reactors in France,” said French physicist Brigitte Leridon.
So how likely is that the LK-99 is the material that scientists have spent 120 years searching for?
Speller said she would be “fairly surprised” if LK-99 turned out to be a room-temperature superconductor, adding: “none of the evidence I have seen thus far is compelling.”
Amalia Coldea, a superconductivity expert at Oxford, told AFP that “so far, I have not been convinced”.
Even if it turns out that LK-99 is a room-temperature superconductor, “it may not be the answer to all our technological wishes anyway,” Speller emphasized.
The material, a mineral called apatite which has some lead atoms replaced by copper atoms, is more like the ceramic in a teacup than metal, she said, meaning it will likely be difficult to bend into useful wires.
As for LK-99, further tests are expected to reveal more about its superconducting potential in the coming weeks—though a definitive answer could take some time.
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” said British scientist Toby Perring.
Scientists skeptical of superconductor claims that went viral (2023, August 9)