Stephen Hawking’s last collaborator on physicist’s final theory
When Thomas Hertog was first summoned to Stephen Hawking’s office in the late 1990s, there was an instant connection between the young Belgian researcher and the legendary British theoretical physicist.
“Something clicked between us,” Hertog said.
That connection would continue even as Hawking’s debilitating disease ALS robbed him of his last ways to communicate, allowing the pair to complete a new theory that aims to turn how science looks at the universe on its head.
The theory, which would be Hawking’s last before his death in 2018, has been laid out in full for the first time in Hertog’s book “On the Origin of Time”, published in the UK last month.
In an interview with AFP, the cosmologist spoke about their 20-year collaboration, how they communicated via facial expression, and why Hawking ultimately decided his landmark book “A Brief of History of Time” was written from the wrong perspective.
The ‘designed’ universe
During their first meeting at Cambridge University in 1998, Hawking wasted no time in bringing up the problem bothering him.
“The universe we observe appears designed,” Hawking told Hertog, communicating via a clicker connected to a speech machine.
Hertog explained that “the laws of physics—the rules on which the universe runs—turn out to be just perfect for the universe to be habitable, for life to be possible.”
This remarkable string of good luck stretches from the delicate balance that makes it possible for atoms to form molecules necessary for chemistry to the expansion of the universe itself, which allows for vast cosmic structures such as galaxies.
One “trendy” answer to this problem has been the multiverse, an idea that has recently become popular in the movie industry, Hertog said.
This theory explains away the seemingly designed nature of the universe by making it just one of countless others—most of which are “crap, lifeless, sterile”, the 47-year-old added.
But Hawking realized the “great mire of paradoxes the multiverse was leading us into”, arguing there must be a better explanation, Hertog said.
A few years into their collaboration, “it began to sink in” that they were missing something fundamental, Hertog said.
The multiverse and even “A Brief History of Time” were “attempts to describe the creation and evolution of our universe from what Stephen would call a ‘God’s eye perspective’,” Hertog said.
But because “we are within the universe” and not outside looking in, our theories cannot be decoupled from our perspective, he added.
“That was why (Hawking) said that ‘A Brief History of Time’ is written from the wrong perspective.”
For the next 15 years, the pair used the oddities of quantum theory to develop a new theory of physics and cosmology from an “observer’s perspective”.
But by 2008, Hawking had lost the ability to use his clicker, becoming increasingly isolated from the world.
“I thought it was over,” Hertog said.
Then the pair developed a “somewhat magical” level of non-verbal communication that allowed them to continue working, he said.
Positioned in front of Hawking, Hertog would ask questions and look into the physicist’s eyes.
“He had a very wide range of facial expressions, ranging from extreme disagreement to extreme excitement,” he said.
“It’s impossible to disentangle” which parts of the final theory came from himself or Hawking, Hertog said, adding that many of the ideas had been developed between the pair over the years.